Check out this site where it’ll show you a cool trick that actually TRIPLES your PC’s performance!
The Ultimate CPU Overclocking Guide!
Part 1 of 2 showing the presentation made by Jules Urbach at AMDs Cinema 2.0 event in New York City on August 11, 2008. Mr. Urbach explains the multiple technologies that promise to usher in a new era combining 3D photorealism, cinematic immersion and video game interactivity made possible in part by AMD graphics processing power and the ATI Radeon(TM) 4870 graphics processor that can deliver more than 1 teraFLOP of compute power on a single chip.
Related Blogs
- Related Blogs on AMD Cinema 2.0, Jules Urbach, Part 1 – NYC, 08.11.2008
Hello there, other side of the uncanny valley!
watch watch?v=FKTAJBQSm10 for more info
lmfao @ JULESWORLD.
thats amazing by 2012 we gone see video games that look like movies
One of the first utilisation will be porn.
Like everything.
First, Military
Then Public use
Then Porn use.
Because transformers AREN’T real and needs to be rendered on computers?
LOL
Agreed. This is all so ANTI filmmaking
movie actors your days are numberd lol
no you didn’t. You’re right!
If they collect the higher level data AAA games could be re-released when hardware supports with very little work.
A game made from high level data sets could simply be recompiled and re-sold at a later date… think of the possibilities.
Mandark haha
Oh god, to think that one day this technology will be so cheap it’ll be useable in pornography – GLORIOUS!
Right now it seems pretty stupid, as they seem to need the actors to still act but within the dome, so why not just make them act without cgi costs?
But once the technology has advanced actors won’t be needed, directors will be able to create the parts that fit there films perfectly, which is really good.
It would save a lot of money in the long run, especially now, when big actors and actresses get paid 10 million +
But why would they want to do this for the cinema??? if its gonna looks so real why cant it just infact be REAL? like how movies should be made… huh
I can understand how this tech will be great for Video Games though! but i just dont understand it for movies thats all
But why would they want to do this for the cinema??? if its gonna looks so real why cant it just infact be REAL? like how movies should be made… huh
I can understand how this tech will be great for Video Games though! but i just dont understand it for movies thats all
God, just imagine modeling a 3d model, and clicking "render" and it being done immediately…
God, just imagine modeling a 3d model, and clicking "render" and it being done immediately…
This guy sounds like Mandark from Dexter’s lab.
This guy sounds like Mandark from Dexter’s lab.
y is dis up side down
y is dis up side down
ooh nice…………..
ooh nice…………..
That demo is probably running at 15fps to render a facial animation and is utilizing most of the 4870×2′s gpu power..i doubt we’ll see actual games with this level of realism for a few years yet.
That demo is probably running at 15fps to render a facial animation and is utilizing most of the 4870×2′s gpu power..i doubt we’ll see actual games with this level of realism for a few years yet.
this will work on near future consoles.
this will work on near future consoles.
once capture the animation can’t be changed. So this technology has a big problem
once capture the animation can’t be changed. So this technology has a big problem
You’re right, as he said, it’s a volumetric render. It’s not an ‘image format’.
You can rotate it and perhaps he should have done so to take the point home, but nevertheless he made it clear.
You’re right, as he said, it’s a volumetric render. It’s not an ‘image format’.
You can rotate it and perhaps he should have done so to take the point home, but nevertheless he made it clear.
The movements were captured in a lightstage and, I suppose, the dataset was put into a computer. After that I guess they could animate. they say it was CG rendered.
Image Metrics allows animators to tweak and polish after they have the dataset.
I’m no expert and I would like to know what is happening there.
The movements were captured in a lightstage and, I suppose, the dataset was put into a computer. After that I guess they could animate. they say it was CG rendered.
Image Metrics allows animators to tweak and polish after they have the dataset.
I’m no expert and I would like to know what is happening there.
Its insane because thats not 3D, its actually an image format that has so much data
per pixel , that can then be re lit in realtime, but only the original video.
You cannot rotate or animate this.
Still damn cool tech… Paul Debevec rocks!
Its insane because thats not 3D, its actually an image format that has so much data
per pixel , that can then be re lit in realtime, but only the original video.
You cannot rotate or animate this.
Still damn cool tech… Paul Debevec rocks!
The cg girl at 6:11 is absolutely insane!!!
You could put her arguing with Davy Jones and she would look better.
I can’t wait for people to snap and say "Oh! It isn’t real??"
For a while I was fooled by Davy Jones, and I thought it was a mask.
I can’t wait for the stuff that this technology will give us now.
The cg girl at 6:11 is absolutely insane!!!
You could put her arguing with Davy Jones and she would look better.
I can’t wait for people to snap and say "Oh! It isn’t real??"
For a while I was fooled by Davy Jones, and I thought it was a mask.
I can’t wait for the stuff that this technology will give us now.